DiagnosisHeart.com: Heart News, Cardiology Updates, Robotic Heart Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery, CABG, Coronary Disease, Heart Disease and More



//-->

                       Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter >>    

Search Articles:
 

 Welcome!
 What's New
 Latest Headlines
 Links & Resources
 Article Archives

 Heart Surgery & Vascular
- Robotic Heart Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Heart Surgery
- Beating Heart Surgery
- Recent Papers

Board Review
- General Surgery Board Review
- ABSITE High Yield Review
- Surgery SHELF Exam Review
- CT Board Review
- CT Oral Board Review
- Cardiology Board Review

 Heart Disease
- General Information
- Prevention
- Wellness & Nutrition
- Heart Healthy Recipes

 Online Store
- Buy Books Online
- Eating for Healthy Heart
- Understanding Heart Disease
- High Blood Pressure & Stroke
- Affiliate Program

 Contact Us
 About This Site
 Advertising Opportunities
 Press Kit

 

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify.This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

Article Summary Printer Friendly Version Send to a Friend

MIDCAB Procedure-An Economic Analysis

by The DiagnosisHeart.com Physician Team
Posted: May 20, 2003

Summary:
Investigators at the Department of Community Research and Community Education, The Hope Heart Institute, Seattle, Wash, USA have assessed the cost comparisons of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass through a thoracotomy (MIDCAB procedure) versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, off-pump bypass surgery through a sternotomy, or angioplasty with or without stenting.

The MIDCAB was compared to other procedures using a MEDLINE search from 1990 to 2002. The authors "critically appraised article adherence to a 10-item methodologic checklist modified to address issues particularly relevant to the MIDCAB procedure."

Ten articles published from June 1997 to March 2001 compared costs and (generally) outcomes of MIDCAB with those of other procedures. All were nonrandomized comparisons, generally of concurrent intrainstitutional clinical series. Stated results generally favored MIDCAB, angioplasty, or off-pump bypass surgery through a sternotomy relative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.

"Few studies adequately ensured the comparability of treatment groups, clearly performed intent-to-treat analyses, comprehensively and credibly measured costs that were considered, or clearly addressed costs and results of preprocedural angiography or postprocedural imaging," according to the authors.

The study has concluded that "most published comparative economic analyses of the MIDCAB procedure have failed to adequately address issues crucial to such evaluations. "

Editor's Comment: The MIDCAB procedure is a fairly new procedure, and any cost analysis attempts should measure the procedure against traditional coronary artery bypass surgery, which has been around for a long time. As such, comparisons are difficult and are subject to criticism. From a technical standpoint, the MIDCAB procedure has done well at mid-term follow-up (3-7 years).

Reference:
Comparative economic analyses of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

Date of Article Publication:
2003

Web Site: http://

 

Other Special Offers: Renegade Motorhomes - Credit Card Consolidation - Credit Counseling - Credit Consolidation
 

(c) 2009 by Dr. A. Freeman. All Rights Reserved. | Terms Of Use | Privacy Notice
Designed by AMF.